Skip to main content
ECOMCAAccounting · Tax · Advisory
Menu

CGST circularMedium impact for ecommerce sellers

CBIC clarifies that the omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules applies retrospectively

Official text · Summary prepared automatically

Document
Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST
Issued
26 Oct 2026
Effective
26 Oct 2026
Issued by
Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC), GST Policy Wing
Official PDF(opens in a new tab)

Want help working out what this means for your business?

We handle GST and TDS compliance, returns and notice replies for D2C and marketplace sellers, and can walk you through how a change applies to your books.

On this page

What it means for ecommerce sellers

CBIC Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST clarifies that the omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, earlier made prospectively with effect from 8 October 2024, will be effective retrospectively from 23 October 2017, following the Supreme Court judgment dated 6 August 2026 in Goodluck India Limited. Rule 96(10) prevented exporters who benefited from IGST exemption on procurement under specified notifications from also claiming IGST refunds on export of those goods, so the clarification concerns sellers who export goods. Field formations are advised to deal with pending proceedings concerning rule 96(10) in accordance with the judgment, and the same treatment applies mutatis mutandis to the omission of rules 89(4A) and 89(4B). The circular does not say whether proceedings that are no longer pending are affected.

Who it affects

  • Exporters who benefited from IGST exemption on procurement under specified notifications and claimed IGST refunds on export of those goods
  • Persons with pending proceedings concerning rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules
  • Persons with proceedings concerning the omission of rules 89(4A) and 89(4B) of the CGST Rules
  • Tax officers in CBIC field formations

Before and after

  • Date from which the omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules takes effect

    Before
    Rule 96(10) was omitted prospectively with effect from 8 October 2024 by the CGST (Second Amendment) Rules, 2024.
    After
    The omission of rule 96(10) will be effective retrospectively from 23 October 2017, the date from which the rule was brought into effect.

What to do

  1. An exporter with a pending proceeding concerning rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules would identify that proceeding, since field formations are advised to deal with pending proceedings concerning rule 96(10) in accordance with the Supreme Court judgment in Goodluck India Limited.
  2. An exporter with a pending proceeding concerning rules 89(4A) or 89(4B) of the CGST Rules would note that the circular applies the same treatment, mutatis mutandis, to the omission of those rules.
  3. A seller would keep a copy of Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST and the Supreme Court judgment dated 6 August 2026 on record with the papers for any such pending proceeding.

Provisions referred to: Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017; Rules 89(4A) and 89(4B) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017; Sub-section (1) of section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897; Notification No. 20/2024-Central Tax dated 8 October 2024 (CGST (Second Amendment) Rules, 2024)

Official text

As issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC), GST Policy Wing. Where the text starts with “Extract”, only the parts that concern ecommerce sellers are reproduced; the official PDF (opens in a new tab) is the authoritative version.

Type a word, number or section to highlight it below.

Page 1 of 2 Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST F. No. CBIC-20001/2/2026-GST Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs GST Policy Wing **** Room No. 16039, Kartavya Bhawan-01 New Delhi, Dated: 26.10.2026 To, The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners (All) The Principal Director General/ Director General (All) Madam/Sir, Subject: Clarification in respect of the omission of rule 96 (10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 -reg. Attention is invited to the decisions of various Courts on the issue of retrospective applicability of omission of rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Rules”). Doubts are being raised by the tax officers as well as taxpayers on the issue as to whether in view of these judgements the omission of sub- rule (10) of rule 96 of the CGST Rules, made w.e.f. 08.10.2024 vide notification No. 20/2024- Central Tax, dated 8.10.2024, is applicable retrospectively from 23.10.2017 (date from which it was brought into effect), as ruled by the Courts. 2. The matter has been examined. In order to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred under sub- section (1) of section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act”) clarifies the issues as under. 3. Rule 96(10) was introduced in the CGST Rules w.e.f. 23.10.2017, with the intention to prevent the double benefit to exporters, so that exporters who benefited from IGST exemption on procurement under specified notifications could not also claim IGST refunds on export of those goods. In the 54 th meeting of the GST Council, held on 09.09.2024, in view of difficulty being faced by the exporters in respect of refund on exports due to restriction, imposed vide Page 2 of 2 rule 96(10), in cases where benefit of the specified concessional / exemption notifications is availed on the inputs, rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules was omitted prospectively w.e.f. 08.10.2024 vide the CGST (Second Amendment) Rules, 2024 (notified vide notification No. 20/2024-GST dated 08.10.2024). 4. Kind attention is drawn to the judgment dated 06.08.2026 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 24550 of 2025, in the matter of M/s Goodluck India Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., along with other connected matters. The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide the said order, has held that in the absence of any saving clause or sunset clause accompanying the omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, the said omission applies to all proceedings pending as on the date of omission. 5. In the matter of M/s Goodluck India Limited, Hon'ble Supreme Court has relied upon the Constitution Bench judgment in Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. Union of India [(2000) 2 SCC 536], wherein it was held that section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 does not apply to the omission of a rule. The Hon'ble Court reiterated that, where a rule is omitted, pending proceedings can continue only where there is an express provision for their continuance, or a legal device has been incorporated in the statute/rules to preserve such proceedings. 6. In view of this decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is hereby clarified that the said omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules will be effective retrospectively from 23.10.2017. Accordingly, the field formations are advised to deal with pending proceedings concerning rule 96(10) in accordance with the said judgment. It may also be noted that such a treatment shall apply, mutatis mutandis, in respect of omission of rules 89(4A) and 89(4B) as well. 7. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular. 8. Difficulty, if any, in the implementation of this Circular may be brought to the notice of the Board. Yours faithfully, (Gaurav Singh) Commissioner (GST)

Questions sellers ask

Is the omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules retrospective?

Yes. Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST, issued by CBIC on 26 October 2026, clarifies that the omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017 will be effective retrospectively from 23 October 2017. The rule had earlier been omitted prospectively with effect from 8 October 2024. The clarification follows the Supreme Court judgment dated 6 August 2026 in Goodluck India Limited, and field formations are advised to deal with pending proceedings in line with that judgment.

What did rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules restrict for exporters?

According to Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST, rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules was introduced with effect from 23 October 2017 to prevent a double benefit, so that exporters who benefited from IGST exemption on procurement under specified notifications could not also claim IGST refunds on export of those goods. The circular does not list the specified notifications. It clarifies that the omission of the rule is effective retrospectively from 23 October 2017.

How does the Goodluck India Supreme Court judgment affect pending rule 96(10) refund proceedings?

Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST records that the Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 6 August 2026 in M/s Goodluck India Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., held that the omission of rule 96(10) applies to all proceedings pending as on the date of omission, as no saving clause or sunset clause accompanied it. The circular advises field formations to deal with pending proceedings concerning rule 96(10) in accordance with that judgment. It does not address proceedings already concluded.

Does the rule 96(10) clarification also cover rules 89(4A) and 89(4B) of the CGST Rules?

Yes. Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST states that the treatment given to the omission of rule 96(10) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, in respect of the omission of rules 89(4A) and 89(4B) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The circular does not describe the content of rules 89(4A) and 89(4B) or state when they were omitted, so it leaves those details to be read from the rules and the Supreme Court judgment it relies on.

Want help working out what this means for your business?

We handle GST and TDS compliance, returns and notice replies for D2C and marketplace sellers, and can walk you through how a change applies to your books.

General information only, not professional advice. The summary is ecomca’s reading of the document; the official PDF is the authoritative version, and later amendments may change it. Check the official source before you act.